https://theheadlinepost.com/
CrimeDehradunInternationalNew DelhiUttarakhand

Son Killed in ₹12 Lakh Contract, Mother Among Five Arrested


Dehradun.12 Feb 2026

The Dehradun Police have solved the sensational daylight murder of gas agency owner Arjun Sharma near Tibetan Market within 24 hours. Two shooters were injured in separate police encounters, and the deceased’s mother along with two of her associates have been arrested for allegedly conspiring in the murder over a property dispute.
Shooters Injured in Separate Encounters
Following instructions from the SSP, intensive checking was carried out across the district. Late at night in the Ladpur area under Raipur police station limits, a suspect opened fire at a police team during checking. In retaliatory firing, he was shot in the leg. He was identified as Rajeev alias Raju (50), a resident of Chakkhuwala. A .315 bore country-made pistol and cartridges were recovered from him.
In another incident near Laltappad under Doiwala police station limits, a scooter rider attempted to flee and fired at the police. In self-defense, police shot him in the leg. He was identified as Pankaj Rana (52), also a resident of Chakkhuwala. A .315 bore pistol and cartridges were recovered from his possession. Both accused are real brothers and have been admitted to Coronation Hospital for treatment.
CCTV Footage Helped Crack the Case
CCTV footage from the crime scene and surrounding areas revealed that two scooter-borne assailants carried out the shooting near Parade Ground Tibetan Market. During interrogation, both accused confessed to shooting Arjun Sharma dead.
₹14 Crore Property Deal Led to Murder
Police investigation revealed that Arjun Sharma had an ongoing dispute with his mother, Beena Sharma, regarding a property on GMS Road. The property was reportedly sold to Dr. Ajay Khanna for ₹14 crore, out of which ₹8 crore had already been paid. However, Arjun Sharma obtained a stay order from the court, halting the deal.
Due to mounting financial pressure and the stalled transaction, Beena Sharma, Dr. Ajay Khanna, and Vinod Uniyal allegedly conspired to eliminate Arjun. The two shooters were hired for ₹12 lakh, of which ₹3 lakh was paid in advance.
WhatsApp Chats and Surveillance Exposed the Conspiracy
During investigation, police found that Pankaj Rana had been in contact with Vinod Uniyal via WhatsApp before and after the incident. It was also revealed that Beena Sharma had earlier sought details about her son’s daily routine from his manager. Based on these findings, police arrested Beena Sharma, Vinod Uniyal, and Dr. Ajay Khanna.
Five Arrested, Weapons and Scooter Recovered
All five accused have been arrested. The two main shooters have been taken into police remand. Police recovered two .315 bore country-made pistols, live and spent cartridges, and the scooter used in the cri

Related posts

Supreme Court Issues Ultimatum to Centre Over Front-of-Pack Food Warning Labels Category: National | Health | Supreme Court | Food Safety By Swati | The International Desk | The Headline Post New Delhi: The Supreme Court has issued a stern ultimatum to the Centre over the implementation of front-of-pack warning labels on packaged food products containing excessive levels of sugar, salt and saturated fat, questioning the government’s approach to a measure aimed at protecting public health. A Bench comprising Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice K. Vinod Chandran expressed strong displeasure over the stance adopted by the Centre and the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI). The court questioned whether regulatory authorities were being influenced by corporate interests while framing food-labelling policies. The matter arose during a Public Interest Litigation concerning mandatory warning labels on packaged food. The petitioner argued that consumers, particularly children, need clear and prominent information about the nutritional risks associated with products high in added sugar, salt and saturated fats. The Bench also scrutinised the FSSAI’s position, observing that its submissions appeared to emphasise opposition from the food industry while allegedly failing to adequately acknowledge evidence supporting warning labels as a tool to discourage excessive consumption of unhealthy ingredients. The court referred to minutes of an FSSAI meeting held on March 7 and noted an apparent contradiction between the regulator’s position and its earlier directives. During the hearing, the Bench questioned Additional Solicitor General Brijender Chahar, representing the Centre, over whether the government was reluctant to take necessary action despite the court’s earlier directions. The controversy highlights the larger policy battle between public-health advocates seeking stronger nutritional safeguards and sections of the food industry opposing stringent front-of-pack warning requirements. The Supreme Court’s intervention has placed renewed focus on the need for transparent food labelling, particularly as lifestyle-related health risks associated with excessive consumption of sugar, salt and saturated fats continue to attract public-health concern. Key Takeaway: The Supreme Court has made it clear that food-labelling policy cannot be shaped merely by commercial considerations and has pressed the Centre and FSSAI for effective action on front-of-pack warning labels.

The Headline Post

Haridwar: GST Office Employee Caught Red-Handed Taking ₹20,000 Bribe

The Headline Post

Kejriwal Acquitted: Court Recommends Action Against CBI Officials

The Headline Post

Leave a Comment